🔗 Share this article

"Half of my personal history is stored on Snapchat, and now they demand us to fork out money for it."

Poor feedback and a feeling of inequity have flooded digital forums since the app joined the latest technology company to put a price tag on a feature that individuals previously utilized for at no cost.

The app's parent company revealed in last month that it would start charging subscribers if they have exceeding five gigabytes of previously shared photos and clips stored as the Memories feature.

Among numerous users, these old snaps function as a portal to bygone days – driving some to criticize the firm of "corporate greed" in comments on social media and negative reviews on Google and Apple's app stores.

Alternative Options

The company has compared its paid storage plans to those offered by major companies for smartphones.

As another possibility for users unwilling to subscribe, users may save their archived media – which for some span large volumes – to their own hardware.

The company indicated that only a minority of members would be affected by the changes.

They recognized that it was "always challenging to shift from receiving a service for free to covering the expense" – but suggested it would be "a valuable investment" for users.

Many opposing the move on the internet appear unconvinced.

User Backlash

A web-based protest dubbed the fee a "memory tax", with commenters calling it "bleak" and "outrageous" – while one person vowed to quit the platform again.

Meanwhile, in a poor evaluation on the digital platform, a person named a pseudonymous user said it felt "deeply unfair".

"As a member of that generation, most of us have years worth of memories on this service," they said. "The vast majority only continued using Snapchat mostly for this purpose. Such limited storage is inadequate when you have a long timeline of memories... Farewell Snapchat."

And, a journalism student, a young adult journalism student in the UK capital, revealed on a social network her decision to delete the app.

"I concluded that I needed to download all my saved content as immediately," she mentioned. "Almost all of my teenage years have been recorded through my saved snaps, all of the photos in there are extremely valuable to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to start charging individuals for a service that has been at no cost for a considerable period."

Uncertain Costs

Snapchat has not yet said how much premium options would cost in the UK – only that they are part of a "slow worldwide introduction".

But a young adult another user, who is based in the capital, commented in a video on the social platform that she would be "distraught" by such charges.

Amber explained that the platform had become "integrated into daily routine" since she started using it in 2014.

While she said she accepted the platform needed to earn income, Amber proposed that the saved content option is more valuable than the firm may have understood.

"In my opinion it's a rather unjust step to charge your subscribers who have been faithful and dedicated," she explained. "This feature is more than a name, these are our genuine personal moments."

Professional Insight

Companies deciding to charge from customers for a service that was previously free is a frequent occurrence, and countless individuals pay for options like cloud storage solutions to save their images and clips from their handset.

The fact of archiving content in the cloud – which various commentators in the tech industry often describe as merely "a remote system" – is that it requires funding.

"Managing enormous quantities of archived media on Snapchat isn't a trivial amount," social media consultant Matt Navarra explained. "The company has to try to find a approach to offset the expenses of data retention, bandwidth, back-ups, media distribution, security measures – the entire process."

However the consultant said that requiring payment for a service that had once been complimentary, and subscribers had been prompted to utilize as such, may feel like a "deceptive practice" for certain individuals.

"Changing the rules after users have created this massive online collection doesn't really sit right," he said. And for many, he continued, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're emotional artefacts."

The opinion was echoed by those submitting critical reviews, with a user describing their Snapchat photos and videos "the most precious thing to me".

"[Memories] have all elements of my life within them from joyful events like births, grieving for lost relatives, times spent with loved ones, [and] my whole teenage years," they wrote.

Research Perspective

An academic expert, a postdoctoral researcher at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, explained that Snapchat's move highlights the implications of business-oriented apps being used to save sentimental personal content.

"The companies profit from this reliance, mutual reliance, and presumption of never-ending access, which even incentivises some users to stay on the service or continue to use it in order to scroll back through their stored media," she informed journalists. "But these are not benevolent guardians of personal memory."