🔗 Share this article

Last year, star Jude Law remarked he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, could coincide too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement instead of a critique.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a television show launched last October, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” Russia from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals frequently result in buttressing this same narrative rather than debunking it. An adaptation inspired by a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the narrative weight to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the background, desiring permanent power.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the detached, unwilling mastermind guided by fate. In reality, none of this took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one actually pleaded with Putin to take the job. The position was in essence a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to the selection stood an influential oligarch from the Yeltsin era who expected to run the country in practice.

• His list included various figures, including a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer close to the events said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in East Germany fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in field operations.

Interestingly, the move to depicting him as a “007” may in part have been triggered by the actor's debut as 007. His harder version prompted Russian media and online audiences to draw visual parallels with Putin. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an star popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally validate the very myths it perhaps aims to examine.