🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor may be the ideal selection for a daring scary movie centered on the biblical figure, however not for the reasons some viewers might assume. Truthfully, Cage does not actually act as Jesus in the new film: his role is listed only as a craftsman. Cage is framed as the Joseph of this story, working to keep his beliefs while the teenage character (portrayed by the young actor), their adolescent adopted son, begins to display supernatural abilities. The explanation it's hard to picture a different major actor playing this part is that while his character grows weighed down with numerous difficulties, Cage himself seems practically moving convinced that the murky, grim small film is a valuable project.

The Actor's Current Career Choices

Nicolas Cage was spending his time more judiciously lately. He yet makes more movies than most regular audiences may ever watch — as an illustration, were you informed that the man has filmed three different Westerns over the last few years? — but he also includes prestige independent films such as one recent hit, Pig, and Longlegs. This new film sounds like in that category, in that it’s genre-adjacent, possibly controversial, and handles a over-the-top description quite seriously.

The Film's Plot and Execution

Sadly, writer-director Lotfy Nathan fails to repay the audience's focus. The film starts from a interestingly wandering setting, positioned as drawing from an unknown scripture about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, the maternal figure, and the boy relocate constantly, anxious of faith-based hostility or doubt about The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Disaster trails us,” The Carpenter sadly observes. That continues when evil influences focus on the household at their new home, getting a jump-start with that well-known scriptural test for The Boy.

Sometimes, the film mirrors an Exorcist-style possession movie, though none of the lead characters are directly possessed. On the contrary, they are progressively isolated mutually, while these entities infect a resident female (Isla Johnston, named “The Stranger”) that the son forms a relationship with, and provides all disturbing images of a grim future. The Carpenter especially grapples with his position in this story, sometimes scolding the boy who mystifies him.

Controversy and Caution

The subject matter is prone to invite debate, and Nathan handles it with much delicacy — too much, maybe. The idea of a teenage boy facing his destined offering and tempted by mysterious forces is certainly frightening, but Nathan could be hesitant regarding appearing sensational and keen to indicate his intentions, so he often withdraws to gloomily threatening filming. Characters constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who demonstrated genuine potential in a recent film update, interestingly — cedes her role to her Mother Mary cloak, occasionally interrupted by some disturbing frightening scenes.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in just the sort of melodramatic acting that those who enjoy his campier roles might be looking for. An instance (shown) in the trailer where he flips out and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” If that kind of dramatic explosion is part of your religious scary film, perhaps a more boldly ridiculous approach would take better advantage of his eagerness to exaggerate if needed. Rather, The Carpenter’s Son more closely resembles the poorer straight-to-DVD movies the actor filmed over the last decade — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and ghost stories that often seem intriguing, and often contain several notable memorable scenes, but ultimately feel like, frankly, low-budget DTV material.

Honestly, a number of those, though not as grand, were more entertaining as a whole. At this point I have to violate my usual practice, not faith-based but work-oriented: Previously, a respected mentor persuaded me to banish adjectives like “monotonous” or “lifeless” from my reviewing language. These phrases convey little except a personal and generically described restlessness, withdrawing from the task of vibrantly communicating the mental and feeling of watching an individual production. It's hard to express boredom without seeming uninteresting personally. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Elaborate,” that is.

But I must confess, I grew weary throughout The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it is a religious style of stultification, not due to The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it demands a sort of obedient endurance to sit through it. Eventually soon after starting, the movie settles into a cyclic tempo of ongoing suffering, and does not